Overview

Vitamin D Replacement in Insulin Resistant South Asians

Status:
Terminated
Trial end date:
2014-01-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
This study will test the hypothesis that 6 months of periodic high dose Vitamin D3 replacement (200,000 and 100,000 units cholecalciferol, oral liquid drops at 6 to 8 week intervals) followed in-between by daily 1000 units, decreases insulin resistance by HOMA2-IR ≥ 0.36, in comparison to control, standard dose Vitamin D3 1000IU/ day for 6 months, in south Asians with both Vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25 Hydroxy vitamin D < 25nmol/l) and insulin resistance (defined as HOMA1 -IR≥ 1.93). The hypothesis formed suggests that insulin resistance developed in South Asians is explained, at least in part, by the presence of Vitamin D Deficiency (VDD). Therefore if the VDD is reversed/ 'normalised into target range' using Vitamin D therapy in individuals at risk of diabetes, then markers of insulin resistance should reduce from baseline values. However, current UK recommended doses of Vitamin D do not adequately replenish severe VDD, common in South Asians, back into the target range and therefore will not reduce insulin resistance markers. Therefore only higher pharmacological doses are able to replace severe Vitamin D deficiency adequately and improve insulin resistance markers.
Phase:
N/A
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
University of Leicester
Treatments:
Cholecalciferol
Ergocalciferols
Insulin
Vitamin D
Vitamins
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

We will include the following people if they meet all criteria:

1. 25-75 year old south Asian (Bangladeshi, Indian or Pakistani) men or women.

2. A low vitamin D level (defined by a specific marker, 25(OH)VitD <25 nmol/L)

3. Insulin resistance, defined as homeostatic model assessment of Insulin resistance
(HOMA1-IR) ≥ 1.93.

Exclusion Criteria:

We will exclude people if they have any one of the following:

1. Those who have been told by a doctor they have diabetes (Type 1 or 2).

2. Those who developed new diabetes (World Health Organisation (WHO) 1999 guidelines)
detected on the Screening Visit fasting glucose test (such participants will be
offered a confirmatory test to determine if they have diabetes with an oral glucose
tolerance test) or the oral glucose tolerance test at Baseline Visit. Any individual
with new diabetes will have follow up arranged with a doctor. If the confirmatory test
does not show new diabetes, the participant will is eligible to re-enter the study.

3. HbA1c ≥ 7.0% which is suggestive of diabetes.

4. Pre-existing calcium and/or Vitamin D tablets (D2 ergocalciferol or D3
cholecalciferol) / therapy (e.g. intramuscular injections, oral liquid preparations)
or previous adverse reaction to Vitamin D (D2 or D3). Any individual who has
previously been on these therapy must have been off Vitamin D/ Calcium for at least
six months.

5. Pregnancy or breast feeding females, or actively trying/ intending to become pregnant
during the planned six month trial.

6. A history of known or newly detected hypercalcaemia or hypocalcaemia,
hyperparathyroidism (that induce high calcium levels), kidney stones or other kidney
problems/ low kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 = Chronic
kidney disease stage 3, 4 or 5) or known history of liver problems/ disorders.

7. A history of known bone diseases (e.g. osteoporosis, osteomalacia, osteopetrosis) or
muscle diseases.

8. Any participant discovered to have new kidney/ liver/ bone or other health problems
discovered during Screening or Baseline visit. Such individuals will have appropriate
follow up organised. A raised Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) will be considered in the
clinical context of symptoms, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Vitamin D level (i.e. may
or may not be excluded).

9. Terminal illness, malignancy or physical inability to give consent (not language
barriers).

10. Taking medications which may interfere with Vitamin D metabolism (phenytoin,
carbamazepine, primidone and barbiturates) or potentially leading to other problems
(bendroflumethiazide, digoxin).

11. Participants unable to commit time for the six month study (e.g. holiday abroad, work
commitments).

12. Actively taking part in another interventional study (e.g. medication, lifestyle
Randomised controlled trials); observational and cross sectional studies are still
permitted.