Overview

Use Of Oral Fidaxomicin Vs. Oral Vancomycin For Clostridium Difficile Infection In Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Status:
Terminated
Trial end date:
2016-10-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of cure and recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection in spinal cord injured patients who are treated with oral Fidaxomicin vs. oral Vancomycin. The secondary aim of this study is to compare the overall costs of treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in the two study groups.
Phase:
Phase 4
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Baylor College of Medicine
Collaborator:
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC
Treatments:
Fidaxomicin
Vancomycin
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Ability of subject to provide an informed consent

- Legally Authorized Representative-Adult must provide consent in case the subject is
unable to consent

- Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease based on clinical manifestations (change in
bowel habits, at least 2 more unformed bowel movements as compared to baseline
neurogenic bowel function in the same patient in the 24-hour period prior to
randomization)

- Lab data (positive polymerase chain reaction test for Clostridium difficile in a stool
specimen obtained within 72 hours before randomization)

- Patient has not received antibiotics that are active against Clostridium difficile for
any more than 24 hours prior to being screened for this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Receipt of agents (oral Vancomycin, oral or IV Metronidazole, oral rifamdin, oral
bacitracin, or oral fusidic acid) that are active against Clostridium difficile for
longer than 24 hours after randomization

- Life-threatening or fulminant Clostridium difficile infection, presence of toxic
megacolon, and history of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease and ulcerative
colitis)

- Allergy to study medications.