Outcomes and Costs Associated With Initiating Maintenance Treatment With Fluticasone Propionate 250mcg/Salmeterol Xinafoate 50mcg Combination (FSC) Versus Anticholinergics Including Tiotropium (TIO) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Dis

• Status: Completed
• Trial end date: 2010-05-01

Summary

To evaluate COPD-related clinical outcomes and total healthcare utilization in commercially insured (at least 40 years with a subanalysis of those aged 65 years and older) COPD population associated with the use of fluticasone/salmeterol combination (FSC) 250/50mcg compared to other initial maintenance therapies (IMTs), specifically, tiotropium bromide (TIO), and either ipratropium bromide or ipratropium bromide/albuterol (IP).

This is a hypothesis testing study

Ho: There is no difference in time to first COPD-related events between FSC and TIO and FSC and IP Ha: There is a difference in time to first COPD-related events between FSC and TIO and FSC and IP

Hypothesis for the key secondary outcome of COPD-related costs that was tested was:

Ho: There is no difference in COPD-related costs between FSC and TIO and FSC and IP Ha: There is a difference in COPD-related costs between FSC and TIO and FSC and IP

Details

• Lead Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline
• Treatments: Albuterol; Bromides; Cholinergic Antagonists; Fluticasone; Fluticasone Propionate, Salmeterol Xinafoate Drug Combination; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Ipratropium; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Tiotropium Bromide