Exteriorized Versus In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery
Status:
Completed
Trial end date:
2004-12-01
Target enrollment:
Participant gender:
Summary
This study was undertaken to compare the two techniques (exteriorized vs in situ) of uterine
repair with respect to patient comfort, hemodynamic changes, surgical time and blood loss, in
patients undergoing elective CD under a strictly standardized spinal anesthetic. We
hypothesized that in situ uterine repair would be more comfortable for the patients.
Phase:
N/A
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital