Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Sedation on Extubation Time in Mechanically Ventilated Preterm Infants

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Trial end date: 2029-12-15

Summary

Very preterm neonates (born before 32 weeks' gestation) often require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) to manage respiratory insufficiency. In France, around 8,250 infants are born annually at \<32 weeks, with an estimated 5,000 needing IMV. Although non-invasive support such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has become more common, a substantial proportion of these neonates still transition to IMV within the first few days of life. To reduce lung injury and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a key strategy in neonatal intensive care involves limiting the duration of IMV and promoting earlier extubation.

However, effective sedation and analgesia are essential for preterm infants subjected to intubation and mechanical ventilation. Traditionally, neonatologists combine a sedative (frequently midazolam) with an opioid (morphine, fentanyl, or sufentanil). Although these agents control pain and distress, they may cause respiratory depression, complicate weaning, and potentially contribute to adverse long-term outcomes. Midazolam, one of the few sedatives authorized for use in neonates, can improve comfort and sedation scores, but concerns persist about hypotension, altered cerebral perfusion, and a possible link to intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Moreover, combining benzodiazepines and opioids can prolong ventilation, increase the risk of complications, and impede timely extubation.

Rationale for Dexmedetomidine (DEX) Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective 2-adrenergic agonist that offers sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties with relatively minimal respiratory depression. Unlike certain other sedatives, DEX induces a state akin to natural sleep, allowing for easier arousal and potentially better respiratory drive. Animal studies suggest that DEX might be neuroprotective, reducing inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptotic processes that can be detrimental to the developing brain. These features make DEX a promising alternative to the commonly used benzodiazepine-opioid regimens in very preterm neonates, who remain especially vulnerable to adverse drug effects.

Minimizing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Reducing the time on IMV is crucial for preventing ventilator-induced lung injury and decreasing the likelihood of BPD. Early extubation is a central goal in this population, but sedation-related respiratory depression can thwart successful weaning and lead to reintubation. By preserving spontaneous breathing more effectively than midazolam or high-dose opioids, DEX may help neonates maintain adequate ventilation as they transition to non-invasive support. Furthermore, DEX's analgesic action could reduce the need for opioids, thereby mitigating withdrawal risks and other opioid-related complications such as feeding intolerance and extended hospital stays.

Objective of the DEXPRE Trial The objective of the DEXPRE trial is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine-based sedation with that of midazolam-based sedation in very preterm neonates requiring IMV. Specifically, investigators aim to determine whether DEX can facilitate more rapid extubation and better overall respiratory outcomes compared to midazolam. By systematically evaluating sedation quality, respiratory stability, and potential side effects, the trial seeks to generate evidence that will guide future sedation protocols in neonatal intensive care units.

• Phase: PHASE3

Details

• Lead Sponsor: Assistance Publique - Hpitaux de Paris
• Collaborator: Dr DATA
• Treatments: Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam