Overview

Comparison of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and 20% Formocresol (FC) in Pulpotomized Human Primary Molars

Status:
Unknown status
Trial end date:
2014-07-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
This prospective clinical randomized controlled trial is established to compare the clinical, radiographic, and histological treatment outcomes between MTA and FC in pulpotomized human primary molars at 6, 12, 18, 24 month post-treatment and to test the hypothesis that Gray Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (GMTA) is a viable alternative to Diluted (20%) Formocresol (DFC) in pulpotomies treatment of human primary molars.
Phase:
N/A
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Details
Lead Sponsor:
National Taiwan University Hospital
Collaborator:
University of Michigan
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Primary first or second molars with normal pulp, reversible, or irreversible pulpitis,
that have vital carious pulp exposures due to caries and whose pulp bled upon entering
the pulp chamber.

- Teeth in which hemostasis could be achieved with pressure of a saline dampened sterile
cotton pellet prior to medicament/material placement.

- No clinical symptoms or evidence of pulp degeneration, such as excessive bleeding from
the root canal, history of swelling, mobility, or sinus tracts.

- Patients with percussion sensitivity or spontaneous and persistent pain but where
hemostasis could be achieved with pressure of sterile cotton pellet.

- No radiographic signs of internal or external root resorption, inter-radicular and/or
periapical bone destruction, or furcation radiolucency.

- No more than one-third physiologic root resorption has occurred.

- Teeth had not previously been pulpally treated.

- Teeth deemed to be restorable with posterior stainless steel crowns.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Not present