Overview

An Open-label Study of Oral Paliparidone for the Treatment of Patients With Co-occurring Opioid and ATS Dependence

Status:
Unknown status
Trial end date:
2017-01-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
Male
Summary
The proposed study will evaluate the tolerability, acceptability and potential efficacy of paliparidone for the treatment of co-occurring opioid and amphetamine-type stimulant (ATS) dependence. In the proposed clinical trial, all patients will first discontinue illicit opioid and ATS and be inducted onto buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) in the inpatient ward at the department of psychiatry before beginning to receive paliparidone. Tolerability and acceptability will be evaluated by assessing the rates of patient retention during treatment, patient satisfaction with treatment and adverse effects during treatment. The potential efficacy of paliparidone will be evaluated with regard to the primary outcome measure: reductions in illicit ATS use, based on urine toxicology testing and self-report. Secondary outcome measures include treatment retention, reduction in HIV risk behaviors and improvements in functional status.
Phase:
Phase 3
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Universiti Sains Malaysia
University of Science Malaysia
Collaborator:
Yale University
Treatments:
Amphetamine
Paliperidone Palmitate
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Meet DSM-IV criteria for both opioid and ATS dependence, as assessed by the Structured
Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID)

2. Active COATS dependence as documented by ATS and opioid-positive urine tests and a
report of at least 2 or more days per week of ATS use over the past month.

3. Age 18 - 65 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Liver enzymes greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal or evidence of liver
failure or acute hepatitis.

2. Having serious medical or psychiatric illnesses: (including current psychotic
disorder, major depression, suicidal or homicidal ideations) or taking medications to
treat depression or psychosis.

3. Refused informed consent or inability to understand the protocol or assessment
questions.