Acid-suppression Drugs After Prophylactic Endoscopic Variceal Treatment of Esophagogastric Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Trial end date: 2026-12-01

Summary

Traditionally, it is considered that gastric acid delays ulcer healing, and acid suppression can reduce the risk of post-banding ulcer bleeding and promote mucosal healing at the ulcer site. A systematic review and meta-analysis performed by our team demonstrated that acid suppression significantly reduced the incidence of bleeding following prophylactic endoscopic variceal treatment (EVT), but had no significant effect on the incidence of mortality, adverse events, or length of stay. Similarly, another systematic review and meta-analysis performed by Lin et al. indicated that PPIs significantly reduced the incidence of bleeding after therapeutic or prophylactic EVT, and the efficacy of PPIs in reducing post-EVT bleeding is related to the duration of PPIs. However, previous studies have indicated that long-term use of acid-suppression drugs (ASD) may increase the risk of bacterial infections and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, current guidelines suggest that ASD should be discontinued after EVT, unless the patient has a clear indication for acid suppression. However, the quality of evidence is poor due to the small sample sizes, predominantly retrospective designs, and inconsistencies in follow-up duration of previous studies. In current clinical practice, most physicians still prefer to use ASD routinely after EVT to prevent post-EVT bleeding. Given the ongoing controversy regarding the routine use of ASD after EVT, we plan to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of the use of ASD after prophylactic EVT on short-term bleeding, adverse events, and mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

• Phase: NA

Details

• Lead Sponsor: General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region