Overview

A Study to Compare Iberdomide Maintenance Versus Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Status:
Not yet recruiting
Trial end date:
2036-01-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of iberdomide maintenance to lenalidomide maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).
Phase:
Phase 3
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Treatments:
Lenalidomide
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria

- Confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM)

- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2

- Received 3 to 6 cycles of an induction therapy that includes a proteasome inhibitor
(PI) and immunomodulatory (IMiD) [eg, bortezomib thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd),
lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVd)] with or without a CD38 monoclonal
antibody, or Velcade® (bortezomib), cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone (VCd), and
followed by a single or tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Post-stem
cell transplant consolidation is permitted

- Participants within 12 months from initiation of induction therapy who achieved at
least a partial response (PR) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with
or without consolidation, according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG 2016)
criteria

Exclusion Criteria

- Progressive disease or clinical relapse (as defined by IMWG response criteria)
following ASCT with or without consolidation or is not responsive to primary therapy

- Smoldering myeloma, solitary plasmacytoma or nonsecretory myeloma

- Known central nervous system/meningeal involvement of MM

- Prior history of malignancies, other than MM, unless the participant has been free of
the disease for ≥ 5 years

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply